The Ring that Binds and Grinds

music-of-the-spheres-2


“There is geometry in the humming of the strings,
there is music in the spacing of the spheres.”
Pythagoras

atomic_bomb.png

Grind and Crack the Dirac,

feynman_dirac
Paul Dirac and Richard Feynman

seventy_squared

stella_dynamics

“So I tried to find what the observables had to be in order to manifest this “information”. The shock was in discovering that the families of observables I characterized in that way could not contain anything which behaved like a Hamiltonian. And, of course, without a Hamiltonian, you cannot even get started in doing traditional Quantum Mechanics. In a sense, what I then showed was that Quantum Theory and Quantum Mechanics do not coincide, and that the former was much bigger than the latter.” — Robert Rosen (AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL REMINISCENCES)

twelve_non_abelian

Dirac_function_approximation

“It seems clear that the present quantum mechanics is not in its final form” — Paul Dirac

Beach and Leech the Landau

discrete_networks
Leech Lattice and Global Dynamic Networks

I was brought up in an interesting time, in the 1950’s and 60’s. Not that I mean this was socially interesting (e.g., Post World War II social ferment of young people), nor politically interesting (e.g., the protests of the sixties), but rather it was scientifically interesting transition from the Analog (0.000 – 1.000) of radios and TVs  to the Digital (0 or 1) of computers.

e-to-pi-i

I went from a slide rule, superheterodyne circuits, calculus, and cybernetic world to an information bit, digital circuit design, and computer world.

Initially I thought that the intersection of those two world views (Weltanschuung) would be where I could make my name: stake my intellectual claim. But I was wrong. Most of my career was in that new world, the world of the Robots and Internet: on the bleeding edge wave of the “digital revolution”.

But I have come back to that intersection.what_is_information_and_figuring_out

The combination of Science, Mathematics, and Information Science in a systemic way.

elkies_power_five_formula

elkies_formula_expanded

leach_field
Exposed Leach Field

seventy_squared

Evolution of Evolution

The Edge of Chaos

The phrase edge of chaos was coined by mathematician Doyne Farmer to describe the transition phenomenon discovered by computer scientist Christopher Langton. The phrase originally refers to an area in the range of a variable, λ (lambda), which was varied while examining the behavior of a cellular automaton (CA) [Finite state machines]. As λ varied, the behavior of the CA went through a phase transition of behaviors. Langton found a small area conducive to produce CAs capable of universal computation. At around the same time physicist James P. Crutchfield and others used the phrase onset of chaos to describe more or less the same concept..

Adaptation to the edge of chaos refers to the idea that many complex adaptive systems seem to intuitively evolve toward a regime near the boundary between chaos and order. Physics have shown that edge of chaos is the optimal settings for control of a system. It is also an optional setting that can influence the ability of a physical system to perform primitive functions for computation.

“Nobody understands Quantum Mechanics” — Richard Feynman

Particle physicists have a simple notion (ala Susskind, d’Hooft, and Hawking) of Information; that is, Shannon information.

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” — Albert Einstein

“This brings up an interesting question: Why is it that particles with half-integral spin are Fermi particles whose amplitudes add with the minus sign, whereas particles with integral spin are Bose particles whose amplitudes add with the positive sign? We apologize for the fact that we cannot give you an elementary explanation. An explanation has been worked out by Pauli from complicated arguments of quantum field theory and relativity. He has shown that the two must necessarily go together, but we have not been able to find a way of reproducing his arguments on an elementary level. It appears to be one of the few places in physics where there is a rule which can be stated very simply, but for which no one has found a simple and easy explanation. The explanation is deep down in relativistic quantum mechanics. This probably means that we do not have a complete understanding of the fundamental principle involved. For the moment, you will just have to take it as one of the rules of the world.…The principle seems so simple… I cannot help you, we understand it more mathematically than physically… Richard Feynman [Lectures in Physics]

“If you don’t understand something said, don’t assume you are at fault.”
 — David West Keirsey

a77bf-1atdmrm1afiyrjxjgovodmw

In the Lost and Found of Mathematics and “Information” Theory

There has been a lot of progress in Information and Computer Science that can now be used to further understanding in relating discoveries in cosmology and particle physics. Adding some Discrete Mathematics (in the form of Group Theory and Number Theory, for example) that has been developed in the later part of the 20th century, a relational complexity approach can be effective in making a meaningful correspondence between physical concepts and information [and mathematical] concepts.

However, the entrenched paradigm of using differential, integral, and tensor calculus to approximating or/and correlating to particle physics concepts needs to step aside, so Formatics can try to pass them by. Abandon the Shannon. Embrace the Hamming and Golay

“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” — Albert Einstein

“Now Moufang it and Emmy ring it twoMake Lise Bind. Oh, Dedekind bother, it’s a unReal hard cut.”

symmetry_monster

Dynamic information bubbles, within dynamic information bubbles, within …

quantum_to_crystal

sporadicgroups.svg
The Non-Abelian Simple Finite Sporadic Groups

spin_configuration

2D Dynamic Symmetry and Asymmetry

2d_symmetric_dynamic-1
180 degree dynamic symmetry demo, Courtesy of the Mathologer

What is the nature of Spin?  What are the kinds of Spin?  Isospin?  What is the meaning of Quantum Spin Up? Quantum Spin Down?

dual_square_gyrobicupola

Beach and Leach the Ort

ultima_thule_ort_cloud
Ultima Thule in the Ort Cloud

Golay and Hamming the Hawking

kirchoff_law_1

to be continued… and added to

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s