Gravity is a discrete form process in context.

Quan-tum: *qua – “in the capacity of”, quan -“shortening”, quant-ity – “ amount“*

Form-atics: *form – “ shape“, atics – ending for making adjectives or nouns, reification*

Quantum Formatics: the study of *discrete form processes* within context: a **wholistic physical in-formation and ex-formation theory.**

### How and Why the World Works.

**General Relativity(GR)** and **Quantum Mechanics(QM)** have been the most successful science enterprises ever. Discovering phenomena like black holes, the tau particle, gravity waves, and predicting precisely the orbit of Mercury, bending of light, the Teller-Jahn effect, the electron neutrino, and countless other effects.

On the other hand,

“We *can’t solve problems* by using the *same* kind of thinking we used when we *created* them.” — attributed to Albert Einstein.

Intriguely, Eric Verlinde has proposed emergent gravity. However, at this moment there seems to be no test that can include, preclude, or exclude his idea. The **concept of Gravity**, whether emergent gravity, hoped for quantum gravity, implicit string theory gravity, or Einsteinian statistical gravity [in the form of General Relativity] essentially assumes some form of mathematical continuity, unspecified and under-defined. Because there are at least six forms of continuity, for example, the following four: **Continuously differentiable** ⊆ **Lipschitz continuous** ⊆ **α-Hölder continuous** ⊆ **uniformly continuous** = **continuous ; The real question becomes: **which kinds of “continuity” is physically at the “quantum foam” levels?– and what are the relations between concepts (qualities) of various “spins”, “charges”, “spaces”, “energies”, “masses”, “distances”, and “forces”, with different kinds of “times”.

**It seems clear that the present quantum mechanics is not in its final form. — Paul Dirac**

Moreover, Quantum Mechanics (QM), using the crutch of Born-Schrödinger probabilities in the guise of Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein statistics, is a very very very precise, but incomplete. Although probabilistic unitary quadratic forms (a “real” scalar product or action of a linear functional on a vector in a complex vector space) can help in calculating measures, there is no “definite qualities”. At the quantum levels, one does not have separable “qualities” — just postulated mixed measures denoted by “quantum numbers” and “probabilitic measures” in the form of “real” and/or “complex numbers”.

Adding the two statistical conceptions: GR and QM has not and will not work. A non-statistical methodology is needed to Relate phenonema at the scales of large (GR) and the phenonema at the scales of small (QM). That methodology needs Relational Forms Frameworks.

### Information Momentum and Latent Exformation: On the Involution and Envolution of the Universe.

Re-Imagining, and Booking Thru Life

To be continued…

Other Architect Rationals include: James Madison, Srinivasa Ramanujan, Emmy Noether, Paul Dirac, Robert Rosen, David Keirsey, Albert Einstein, Lonnie Athens, David Bohm